Thursday, February 5, 2015

Chicago Jazz in the 1920's

     Determining the relative importance of Chicago and New York as facilitating locations of jazz production is difficult for two reasons; first, many talented musicians came out of each location, in some cases the same musician produced music in both Chicago and New York at different times. Second, the music produced in one location influenced and in turn, was influenced by the music produced in the other. Undoubtedly, the mutual influence of these different forms of music coupled with the varying preferences of their respective audiences are the key elements in the formation of a modern day conception of jazz music. That being said, the developments underwent by the genre in Chicago during the 1920's, thanks in large part to the work of musical figures like Bix Beiderbecke, Louis Armstrong and Earl Hines constitute a new brand of jazz, one involving faster tempos and greater influence on solos. Appealing to a wider audience, it was these types of changes that strengthened jazz as an art form and ultimately allowed for its appreciation on a much larger scale.
     Undoubtedly, a contributing factor to the establishment of Chicago as a home for jazz music was the Great Migration, in which “some half-million African Americans left the South for more tolerant communities in the North” (Gioia 45). Among them, the future major players in the Chicago jazz scene, indeed “only those that departed [the south] made major reputations” (Gioia 45). Those making the move however, were not all African American; in fact, musicians of all races and styles converged on the city to take advantage of the economic and expressive opportunities the city presented (Gioia 76). As a result of this demographic influx, Chicago became a hallmark of diversity. This, in combination with the adoption of gigs on a more contractual basis, contributed to Chicago's recognition as an important jazz center (Travis 48). As many of Chicago's nightclubs came under the control of criminal organizations, black jazz artists received recognition from a larger segment of society as they took the stage in front of white audiences (Travis). In summation, each of these factors in cohesion allowed jazz to thrive in Chicago during the 1920's.
     Although some may argue that jazz in Chicago was simply a reformulation of earlier New Orleans' styles, the developments made by musicians such as the Austin High Gang, Eddie Condon, Bix Beiderbecke, and Louis Armstrong provide justification for Chicago jazz not only as a unique musical style, but as “a way of life” (Gioia 74). Widely referred to as 'hot jazz,' the music produced here during this time caught many people off guard. The fast-paced syncopation and upbeat rhythm of early Chicago jazz contained within it a certain “restless energy” (Gioia 75). It was this “juxtaposition of rhythmic notions” that promoted a sort of “agitated feeling” within the mind of the listener” (Chicagoans 161). During this time, thirty-two-bar forms became the prefered medium of performance while elements of blues and ragtime largely fell by the wayside. (Gioia 77). As jazz gained recognition from different segments of society, the mass market began to take hold of jazz music contributing to the genre's place in popular culture.
     Of the dozens of incredibly talented musicians present at the time, none exemplifies the adaptive nature of Chicago jazz music better than Louis Armstrong. Aside from his renowned capacities for improvisation, Louis Armstrong possessed the ability to adapt to the preferences of different audiences. This ability comes to light in Armstrong's level of comfort “working within the narrower confines of popular music” (Gioia 66). It was in the bustling environment of Chicago that Louis Armstrong composed the Hot Fives and Hot Sevens, perhaps the most beloved and inspirational body of work ever produced under the heading of jazz (Gioia 60).


6 comments:

  1. This is very well written and thought out. I particularly enjoyed the opening paragraph, which compared Chicago and New York and brought up that both cities undoubtedly had a major influence on the progression of jazz. That being said, the great migration also affected New York as well. During that migration, Harlem was transformed from a middle class white neighborhood to a black slum. This also cause an intermixing of cultures that you mention happened in Chicago. You do make a very compelling argument for why Chicago jazz is a new style, both the music itself and the mode of production are unique and distinct from any jazz seen before that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The way that you go into the interplay between Chicago and New York both with music and musicians is a provocative idea that you articulate well. Having taken the opposing position of New York, I think you brought up some interesting points as to the credence of Chicago's own importance and influence showing jazz as a way of life rather than simple music.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great intro. It made it clear that you're aware that Chicago was not the only significant influence on jazz during the 1920's. That being said, you argued that Chicago became a hallmark of diversity after the Great Migration, which undoubtedly is true, but it would have been nice to know more specifically how this induced diversity contributed to the development of Chicago's 'hot' jazz.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thoroughly enjoyed an absolutely agree with your description of the jazz style in Chicago. Specifically the sentence, "The fast-paced syncopation and upbeat rhythm of early Chicago jazz contained within it a certain “restless energy” (Gioia 75),"
    paints a vivid picture in my head of the style of jazz in Chicago. That being said, I think you could benefit with a little more explanation about why exactly Chicago was superior to New York in its 1920's influence. Didn't the great migration extend to New York just as well as Chicago? Are the specific artists truly the reason that Chicago flourished, or was there another driving factor?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a great blog! The claims you make are very well evidenced, and the progression of your thought process is clear and easy to follow. I like how you mentioned the increased diversity of Chicago not only in blacks but in other ethnic groups as well. I will say however that you did not provide much counter-argument to your topic, for example you have Louis Armstrong as your premier Chicagoan, however he did make a considerable impact on the New York scene as well.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very well written and thought out. I agree with previous comments in that your intro paragraph showed that you are aware of the influences of jazz did not just stem from one area. I thoroughly appreciate that you did not use only one source, therefore allowing for multiple perspectives to be heard in your argument.

    ReplyDelete